Contact
Subscribe
Bookmark
Categories
Advertisements
Blogroll
Tag Cloud
- Abuse (391)
- Cats/Kittens (536)
- Dogs (314)
- Grooming & Diet (131)
- training (40)
- Uncategorized (16)
Tags: 
I like him. I like him a lot. 2nd to Ron Paul, my favorite politician.?
#GaryJohnson2012? GO GARY! snubbed by republicans now running #libertarian yay! plz give him your support Gary Johnson 2012 .com
I’m glad I? finally found another republican candidate (or at least would-be) I can agree with.
@Hdtexan thats not the tea party,? thats just some republicans..dumbass
What a? sack of shit these teatards are.
Don’t give up Gary? everyone luvs ya
Paul Johnson? 2012
That was great. Made the point flawlessly?
johnson ended obama’s reelection campaign right? there
It really doesn’t matter how many jobs Obama’s administration “creates” when the unemployment rate is the 2nd lowest it’s ever been in recorded history! Since Obama took office, unemployment skyrocketed up to 10%! I cannot post links but if you type “unemployment rate” into Google, the? first result is a pretty graph.
Mathematically, dogs win hands down, because pet care requires job creation, Obama’s administration kills them.
1. My neighbors dogs requires dog food which is a $19.53 billion dollar industry that employs over 103,000 Americans (US Department of Commerce.)
If you include the entire pet care industry into the equation, which encompasses visits to? the vet, medicine, supplies & toys, you have a $50.84 Billion-dollar industry (APPA.)
@JCGrantatAC
Right on….
But Bush wasn’t exactly all lollipops and rainbows…
And it doesn’t matter if unemployment is less than 1%, if all the employees are working service economy jobs….
Ie: Perry’s numbers in? Taxus
@kaysandesses Let me do some more basic math for you, little fella. The average monthly unemployment rate during the eight years of President George W. Bush was 5.2%–that’s nearly full employment under modern economic theory. Under Barack Hapless Obama, the average monthly unemployment rate is 9.3%. Do you know why? It’s b/c there has been a net loss of 2.4 million jobs since this inexperienced, intellectual midget became President. In my town, his resume wouldn’t? qualify him for mayor.
@kaysandesses Climate change theory doesn’t even follow the Baconian method from the 16h century. What’s more, keeping original data on scraps of paper in some nutjob’s office, and then losing them, doesn’t meet elementary school standards of science. That’s why the loser contemplated killing himself. You’re right? about one thing, though: Dr. Happer’s statement isn’t science. It’s a statement by a renowned physicist about barely educated climatologists and left-wing loons propagating a hoax.
@nbarile18 I disagree. I think CNN’s “objective criteria” in omitting Johnson was to leave Paul as the only candidate of his kind… thus marginalizing him further as an “outsider”. If CNN had included Johnson in their debates, they would have? had to acknowledge more libertarian issues, something they didn’t want to do.
Fox has done the right thing here by including both Johnson and Paul in the debates; there is a much needed libertarian flavor that would be lacking if it was just one of them.
@JCGrantatAC “Even? your favorite? unauthoratative source, Wikipedia”
Nice projection unlearned one.
@JCGrantatAC Wow! So you honestly think that the opinion of one scientist (whose expertise is not in climate science) outweighs the research and expertise of thousands of scientists worldwide? on this issue? You *might* know a lot about math but it’s apparent your knowledge of how scientific research is conducted and how the information gleaned from that research is disseminated, wouldn’t fill a thimble. Among other things, Happer’s statement is not “science”.
@kaysandesses Among other things, Princeton physicist William Happer, PhD says: “This is George Orwell. This is the ‘Germans are the master race. The? Jews are the scum of the earth.’ It’s that kind of propaganda, … Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Every time you exhale, you exhale air that has 4 percent carbon dioxide. To say that that’s a pollutant just boggles my mind. What used to be science has turned into a cult.”
@kaysandesses. Total left-wing BS! Bushs’s worst day in office is far better than Obama’s best day in office in regards to the economy. There are FAR more people unemployed today than Obama’s first day in office. In fact 2.4? million more people do not have jobs than Bush’s last day in office. The dept of Labor’s website will explain this to you and even show pictures to help you understand. Your left-wing math doesn’t work here. You are wrong. The war on terrorism is the same as Bush’s idiot!
@kaysandesses Are you kidding little fella? Even your favorite unauthoratative source, Wikipedia, has a “hockey stick controversy” submission with about 150 footnotes. And, it doesn’t even mention half of the renowned physicists and mathematicians who laugh at and mock how the climatologist community calculated the world’s “average” temperature. William Happer, PhD in physics from Princeton and? a member of the National Academy of Sciences has written at length about the entire fraud.
@aSingleDallasGuy My point is that Obama has done better in the jobs category that the fucking idiot GWB.
Hope and change is actually working out fairly well: we’ve had a good start to comprehensive healthcare reform, the repeal of DADT (which was a fucking joke from the beginning), draw down of troops in Iraq, and improved economy, and a dramatically improved presence internationally. Of course there is more? to be done, but it’s a good start.
@JCGrantatAC You *might* be competent at math but your reading comprehension skills are obviously lacking.? Or… you’re simply dodging the issue because you know your point is the losing one, i.e. you’re unable to provide scientifically sound proof of a scientific conspiracy, or that the global body of scientific research on the issue of global climate change is in error.
Polish up your tin-foil hat son, the conspiro rays are leaking through.
@kaysandesses If you had? a basic education, you could easily do the work yourself. These flat earther math deniers are the same degenerate ilk who were taking billions in grant money in the ’70s while getting hysterical about global cooling. And, they rely on sheep like you to grow their climate change lie every 30 years. There’s no statistically significant correlation between time and temperature anywhere on earth. Go back to high school stats class kid.
@kaysandesses …. LOL, are you kidding me? This is? your defense of Obama. That ONLY 2.4 million jobs was lost on his watch? This is priceless! You should request Obama use this for his re-election slogan. How About; “Obama! I Suck a little less than the last guy!”… LOL Keep clinging to that hope and change! How’s that working out? LOL
@JCGrantatAC “By proof I mean evidence that would pass scientific scrutiny.”
I’ll spoonfeed that to you: It means peer-reviewed scientific research. ? BTW, rambling about a giant conspiracy in the scientific community does not qualify as an answer.
“Get a basic education.”
I hate to deflate your balloon, but I’ll take the aggregate education of the members of the National Academy of Sciences over whatever you’re copying from a climate change denier website.
Try again if you wish.